What is it like to be a bat?I frequently thought about this question while I studied bat echolocation while pursuing my Ph.D. at Brown University. "What Is It Like to Be a Bat?" is the name of a philosophy paper written by Thomas Nagel in 1974. The paper isn't really about the sensory world of bats; it's a critique of reductionist theories of the mind. Nagel argues that consciousness has a subjective aspect, and that understanding other mental states is difficult or impossible for those not able to experience those mental states.
Nagel chose bats for a reason. They are mammals, and relatively closely related to humans. We have a great deal in common with bats: we are warm-blooded, care for our young, and have similar basic anatomy. But "anyone who has spent some time in an enclosed space with an excited bat knows what it is to encounter a fundamentally alien form of life," Nagel writes. He goes on to say that bats experience a range of activity and possess a sensory apparatus so different than ours that imagining what their experiences are like is an exceptionally challenging rhetorical question.
This philosophical question stayed in the back of my mind. When applying for grants, I would say that studying bat echolocation could help the Navy design better sonar systems, or help future researchers better understand how sounds are turned into neural signals in the brain. But what interested me were the bats themselves. What was it like to be a bat? What is it like to perform aerial acrobatics, live most of your life in complete darkness, and acquire nearly all of your information about the world from echoes bouncing off objects and back to your ears?
Although my degree is in psychology, my research and my interests fall into the field of neuroethology. Neuroethology is a multidisciplinary field made up of neurobiology (the study of the nervous system) and ethology (the study of natural behavior). Neuroethologists seek to understand how the brain translates stimuli into natural behaviors.
The emphasis on natural behavior, sometimes referred to as instinctive or innate behavior, sets neuroethology apart from other branches of neuroscience. You can think of natural behavior as those behaviors developed over the course of a species' evolution, like navigation, locomotion, predator defense, and mating. Studying naturally occurring behavior often means observing animals on their own turf. Unlike behaviorism, in which animals' reactions to artificial stimuli in a laboratory are studied, neuroethological studies often begin with the analysis and categorization of an animal's behaviors in the field. If the experimenter chooses to perform more controlled experiments in a laboratory, he or she makes an effort to mimic the natural context as closely as possible.Another characteristic delineating neuroethology from other fields is the wide range of animal subjects. It's not just mice and fruit flies. Neuroethologists often choose to study animals that are specialists in a particular type of behavior (for example, bat echolocation or moth pheromone signaling). The neuroethological approach arises from the idea that animals' nervous systems have evolved to solve problems relevant to those animals in their environmental niche. Therefore, different nervous systems can be best understood in the context of the problems they have evolved to address.
I want Animal Minds to be a blog that celebrates animal behavior in all its diversity. I want to share the sense of wonder and excitement I still feel when I read about an animal's behavior or abilities that I didn't know about. The sensory world of different species has always interested me. Some animals have such foreign ways of interacting with their environments - honeybees see ultraviolet light, dogs can smell disease on human breath, sea lions can track fish in unlit waters by detecting turbulence trails with their whiskers - what is it like to sense the world this way?
On this blog I will share stories about the latest neuroethological research. I have a soft spot for bats, but I hope to foster a sense of fascination and respect for all animals. I hope if you have any questions or topics you'd like me to cover, please tell me in the comments or send me a message.
Your browser is not secure
You're seeing this page because your web browser tried to connect to Warwick's website with insecure settings. Please upgrade your web browser.
The TLS 1.0 encryption protocol is disabled across the University's web services. Disabling TLS 1.0 prevents it from being used to access Warwick websites via an insecure web browser or application. We've made this change to keep the University's websites safe and secure.
What do I need to do?
When accessing websites using a web browser, ensure you use the latest available version of the browser – whether that is Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Safari or another browser. Using the latest version keeps you safe online because you're using the most up-to-date security settings.
Why is this happening?
Although TLS 1.0, when configured properly, has no known security vulnerabilities, newer protocols are designed better to address the potential for new vulnerabilities.
The PCI Data Security Standard 3.1 recommends disabling “early TLS”:
“SSL and early TLS are not considered strong cryptography and cannot be used as a security control after June 30, 2016 [without a mitigation strategy for disabling it before June 2018].
The best response is to disable SSL entirely and migrate to a more modern encryption protocol, which at the time of publication is a minimum of TLS v1.1, although entities are strongly encouraged to consider TLS v1.2.”
We need to be PCI-compliant to take online payments at the University. It is not sufficient to merely disable TLS 1.0 on our transaction tracking system as the requirement extends to any system that initiates a payment, including car parking, printer credits, the Warwick website, etc.